![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
So, Robin Hood?
May. 15th, 2010 02:18 amBad.
Like, I would proactively encourage people not to go see it bad.
Or at least, it might be entertaining, but knowing that it's meant to be a prequel to the traditional story before you start watching it is kind of critical. 'Cause, y'know, when someone tells me Robin Hood, I think Sherwood Forest and Sheriff of Nottingham and stealing from the rich to give to the poor. And this? This was not that.
... and even then, it still kind of felt like good acting and naked men stuck with a pretty awful plot and scenes that felt like they'd fit more in Gladiator or Braveheart than Sherwood Forest. I mean, we basically got the history of the Magna Carta with a side of the Battle of Agincourt, thrown together with a dash of fictionalization and, of course, a woman who wears her dead father's armor into battle.
Bleh.
Like, I would proactively encourage people not to go see it bad.
Or at least, it might be entertaining, but knowing that it's meant to be a prequel to the traditional story before you start watching it is kind of critical. 'Cause, y'know, when someone tells me Robin Hood, I think Sherwood Forest and Sheriff of Nottingham and stealing from the rich to give to the poor. And this? This was not that.
... and even then, it still kind of felt like good acting and naked men stuck with a pretty awful plot and scenes that felt like they'd fit more in Gladiator or Braveheart than Sherwood Forest. I mean, we basically got the history of the Magna Carta with a side of the Battle of Agincourt, thrown together with a dash of fictionalization and, of course, a woman who wears her dead father's armor into battle.
Bleh.
